留言反馈
-
姓名： Emanuelliz 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Reading this back to back with a similar piece elsewhere made the quality difference obvious, and a stop at curvecalm only widened the gap, comparing content side by side is a useful exercise and the gap between this site and average competitors in the space is large enough to be noticeable from the first paragraph.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： EverettSpore 时间： 1970-01-01内容： Decided to write a short note to the author if there is contact info anywhere, and a stop at muffinmarble extended that intention, the urge to thank the writer directly is a strong signal of content quality and this site has triggered that urge in me today which is a fairly rare event for my reading.回复： 暂未回复
-
姓名： Normandus 时间： 1970-01-01内容： If quality blog writing is dying as people sometimes claim then this site is one piece of evidence that it has not died yet, and a look at lionpilot extended that evidence, the broader cultural question about online writing has empirical answers in specific sites and this one is contributing to a more optimistic answer overall.回复： 暂未回复