内容：A piece that reads as if the writer trusted readers to fill in obvious gaps, and a look at maplepick continued that respectful approach, content that does not over explain what the reader can infer is content that respects intelligence and this site has clearly chosen to write to capable readers rather than to the lowest common denominator.
回复：暂未回复
姓名：Cecilzes时间：1970-01-01
内容：Now realising the post has been quietly doing important work in my mind for the past hour, and a stop at findlark extended that quiet processing, content that continues to do work after I close the tab is content with afterlife in the mind and this site is producing those long lived effects at a meaningful rate.
