内容：A clear case of writing that does not try to do too much in one post, and a look at luxmixo maintained the same scoped discipline, posts that try to cover too much end up covering nothing well and this site has clearly chosen scope discipline as a core editorial principle which shows up clearly in what I read.
回复：暂未回复
姓名：Garrettsit时间：1970-01-01
内容：Now feeling slightly more committed to my own careful reading practices having read this, and a stop at meadochre reinforced that commitment, content that models the kind of attention it deserves is content that calibrates the reader and this site has clearly raised my own bar for what to bring to good writing today.
回复：暂未回复
姓名：GeoffreyStism时间：1970-01-01
内容：My friends would appreciate a few of these posts and I will be sending links accordingly, and a look at upperspruce added more pages to my share queue, content that earns shares to specific people in specific contexts is content with social utility and this site is generating those targeted shares from me consistently lately.
