内容：Now recognising the editorial wisdom of letting some questions remain open at the end, and a look at decordistrict continued that intellectual honesty, content that does not force closure on contested questions is content that respects the limits of knowledge and this site has clearly developed the maturity to know when to leave space.
回复：暂未回复
姓名：MariobEx时间：1970-01-01
内容：Just sat with this for a bit longer than I usually would because the points are worth thinking about, and after sendersanctuary I had even more to chew on, the kind of post that nudges your thinking forward without forcing the issue is something I have always appreciated in good writing online.
回复：暂未回复
姓名：ReidTig时间：1970-01-01
内容：Thanks for treating the topic with the seriousness it deserves without becoming pompous about it, and a stop at topfootwearus continued that balanced treatment, the gap between earnest and self serious is huge and writers who can stay on the right side of it earn my respect when I find them online today.
